Oh, shut up, Neil! Shut up! Shut up. It’s pathetic. I mean, what about radical magazines? What about Kicker boots?! Can we grow them? No, we can’t, can we?! — Rick
Very loosely, part of the Small web movement. The digital garden is a metaphor for a new (or very old) kind of personal website. Not a rigidly chronological blog, or a static site that only contains completed work. A digital garden is more organic; an evolving collection of thoughts in various stages of completion.
Digital gardens are not a new invention but rather a return to the original concepts behind hypertext. A dynamic, interconnected space for information and ideas. The mutable descendant of the Renaissance commonplace book.
The Metaphor of Growth and Evolution
The metaphor implies growth, cultivation, evolution, and, crucially, no “done” state. This differs markedly from the processes we inherited from traditional dead-tree publishing.
Personal appeal
It’s attractive to me because of the implicit permission to publish work in progress, and to edit old publications in light of new information. It’s a “colour outside the lines” kind of a permission.
Problems
They’re great for the writer, but harder on the reader. I’ve no doubt that if this site was mostly blog posts, it would be a lot easier to read. I’m ok with that, here. If I was trying to reach an audience - if I was doing anything more than scratching my own itch - my approach would be completely different.
Tools
Obsidian, designed for wiki-like note-taking, is a natural fit for the digital garden metaphor. Publication is either via Obsidian’s own Obsidian Publish or via a static site generator (the easiest being Quartz).
Conclusion
Not having to achieve “done done” is freeing. Will digital gardens influence the broader culture of the web?
Links
Quote
Rather than presenting a set of polished articles, displayed in reverse chronological order, these sites act more like free form, work-in-progress wikis.
— Appleton, Maggie (2020) A Brief History & Ethos of the Digital Garden source